I recently had a conversation with a wholesale grocer who was explaining to me what a great deal they offered to the independent grocer.
He explained to me that they were the lowest cost of distribution possible and how his customer (the independent grocer) was far ahead by getting out of the self distribution game. On the surface the cost looked to be much lower but upon closer examination it may not have been all it was cracked up to be.
The independent would enter into a distribution agreement that contained a logistics charge that was very reasonable. When I questioned the wholesaler’s category manager how it was possible to run a full assortment warehouse with an extremely high service level at such a low cost. The answer was – the manufacturer. He said, “The manufactures pays us to participate in the program.”
This model is designed to push the cost of distribution back on the manufacturer. In other words the model is less expensive for the grocer but it increases the cost of doing business for the vendor. When the vendor I was representing was told that he would have to pay set up fees and an ongoing incentive fee, the answer was, “then we have to raise the price to the retailer – either we raise the list or we reduce the promotions”. If this is a common answer among the wholesaler’s vendors, then is this wholesaler really a good deal?
As an independent grocer you always have to ask yourself, “When is a deal not a deal?”
-Mike























